Stereotypes of people of color have, as a whole, created the idea that people should behave a certain way. This means that people of a certain race sometimes feel as if they should conform to the standards laid out for them, usually ones involving inferiority. It also means that whoever is interacting with people of that race – white or otherwise - will have ideas in the back of their minds about how they should expect the member of another race to behave. This idea is outlined in the introduction to our book, Playwrights of Color, which says, “Whether positive or negative, stereotypic thinking substitutes commonly held assumptions of a group for an understanding of the individual. An individual is expected to conform to the stereotypic image of his or her group” (2).
When looking at the first chapter, we can see stereotypes of African Americans that are obviously not true and are exaggerated for humor. When watching a clip from the play Day of Absence, it’s hard to hear the actors reading their lines over the laughter of the audience. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SxanvCSzEo&feature=related
While it’s good for a play to entertain an audience, it also illustrates that people are accepting of the portrayal of these characters. They are reacting in the way that stereotypes build. They expect these stereotypes and can see truth in them, and often the truth is the most humorous. The two men playing southerners play a very typical role of being racist and arrogant, asking Rastus forcefully where he was the other day. Similarly, Rastus plays to the role of a clown and inferior character. He backs down and says that they must be right about what day it is and then shuffles off the stage in a comical manner. These characters are simply that, so it’s not safe to assume that these overgeneralizations would lay themselves on the backs of African Americans with how to behave. Still, they create these expectations for them to be jesters when they’re not working, who are ironically most often chosen as the truth speakers while the audience laughs.
Another good look at this type of comedy and the roles that each race fills is “Los Vendidos.” A good statement in the chapter that talks about this play is, “The reason Honest Sancho is successful in conning Miss Jimenez (and us) is that he so effectively meets our expectations” (59). The secretary is clearly being offensive in her questions and quite frankly, her role as a person purchasing another human being. However, it’s also humorous because of the way we expect to see a ‘government worker’ acting this way. It’s a good portrayal since the audience gets to see something close to themselves, but has the ability to not feel guilty, since they are most likely not going to go out after the show to purchase a farm worker. The stereotypes of Mexicans in this play – the laborer, the revolutionary, and the street man – also fit the common ideas of how we expect the members of the race to act. The way they’re made into machines helps detach the audience from thinking that these are harmful and accept them as simply characterizations. The final scene can help correct any misgivings about these ideas by showing a triumph over the supposedly superior secretary.
Angie,
ReplyDeleteYou started out with a very powerful introduction. I really like this. It engaged me right away. Then you went on to explain the Chapter one. I like how you explained the exaggeration that was put on African Americans but I really liked how you decided to talk about Day of Absence. Day of Absence really stood out to me. I read parts of this play twice. I think the story line of this play is hilarious. Since the white people were busy mocking African Americans with the skits; the African Americans than in return decided to make their own play mocking the white people. The movie clip from YouTube was also neat. I never thought of adding a video clip to make my point but it was a good extra!!
A good statement in the chapter that talks about this play is, “The reason Honest Sancho is successful in conning Miss Jimenez (and us) is that he so effectively meets our expectations” (59). This line really stood out to me. Great evidence!!! I also thought this was hilarious because this character fitted a stereotype of an official close to the President.
I really enjoyed reading your blog post. You had some great evidence but I would have ended your blog a little differently. I didn’t really see a full conclusion wrap up; I know this is just a blog but this could have helped your credibility a little bit more.
NICE WORK!!!!
Thank you so much for the comment, Lindsey. I'll definitely try and wrap up my next post a bit better with a more conclusive statement. This was a problem I noticed when I first wrote it, but I wasn't sure exactly how to write it since it was my first blog post, but I'm glad you liked my introduction. I really liked the first two plays we read, and it was really interesting to see parts of them performed, so I thought it would be helpful in using them when writing about the example, expecially since someone else may have watched it and noticed something differently than what I pointed out.
ReplyDelete